Smart Watches

Nvidia rtx 390 review

Hello guys myself siddik khan 

Nvidia's RTX 3090 line cap. No, no, no time for that! We need to talk about this now. If you haven’t watched our review of the RTX 3080, here’s the domain you need. The RTX 3000, also known as Ampere is what Nvidia calls the biggest leap in performance in the company's history. Now, if you go back long enough, Stop and press X here, but he also doesn't play. These cards, unlike the critical RTX 2000 series, smoke quickly out the gate with our RTX 3080 which reaches a speed of 75 to 100% faster than its predecessor, depending on the function. That, combined with Nvidia’s impressive DLSS 2.0 upscaling technology means that 4K games have gone from one day to the present, right now. But wait, there's more. Like this message from our sponsor, Team Team. Xtreem Group ARGB DDR4 playback memory includes up to 4000 megahertz clock speed and an amazing new RGB design. Take a look at their launch event showcasing their three products, and you can find the $ 3000 PC at the link below. But 3080 is the news of last week. In my hands right now is what Jenson, the chief executive of Nvidea is affectionately called BFGPU. And, spoiler warning, you're right. This is the RTX Titan scale. Heck, here is the ROG Strix OC scale. This is the simplest, not to mention the heaviest, most common graphics card I've ever seen. Which means that anyone who buys one should also make another additional investment. First, you will need a case for a solid GPU mount, with sufficient clearance. Since both are longer and thicker than previous flags, they will not fit in most small objects. That is, unless you burn them. Second, you will need a phat power supply. Measured by 350 watts of power consumption and with Nvidia's new 12-pin connector, the 3090 can easily push your previous unit to its limits. Lastly, you will need the fastest CPU gaming in the world because to be honest, with anything else, you will be leaving work on the table, which you don’t want to do when you pay $ 1500 US dollars for a graphics card. Yes my friends, compared to the RTX 3080, the first GPU 8K gaming gets you more than twice as much, not to mention fast video memory, 20% cuda tensor and RT cores, and NV link support with new connector which may have reduced the amount of space lost to the physically cut PCB that makes Nvidia's new flow pass cool. But wait, double video video memory? Why? Yes, in addition to giving you the ability to calculate the best and most importantly, the ability to provide the most complex 3D scenes in software like a blender. As it turns out, playing in 8K also really demands this video memory. I mean, think of it. The AK is 33 megapixels in 32 bits per pixel. That means showing just one frame, 128 megabytes of video memory is needed, not too bad, but it adds textures, models, screen space effects, and, of course, track RTX real-time ray. I mean, come on. And you have found that for yourself many times. Ideally, 60 times per second or more. Wolfenstein YoungBlood has entered more than 11 gigs of memory usage at AK. Sounds fun, but at the end of the day, everything boils down to performance, doesn’t it? So on request, we built a Core i9 10900K test bench to reduce our CPU blocks, and our dog our RTX 3080 and 2080 Ti and Titan RTX for comparison. Starting with Minecraft RTX, we see an improvement in the frame rate of 22% over the RTX 3080 and whopping 51 to 60% above the Titan RTX both existing and closed DLSS. Not bad. Wolfenstein Youngblood is currently giving us more performance improvements over 3080 by about 15%, but while still delivering a decent 50% upgrade over the Titan RTX, the card costs a thousand extra bucks. So you have it, boys. Buy yourself a RTX 3090 and a water bottle with all your savings, right? CS Go and Microsoft Flight Simulator tell the same story in 4K. Interestingly, however, the gap is greatly narrowed in Flight Simulator at 1440P due to CPU issues. Okay, except for the OPCPU and ultra image settings. Finally, the compatible N64 emulator, which makes more graphics and audio simulations in the GPU than the CPU, and the newly installed upgrade support, shows that additional pum brings it to a frame 99 times, close to 60 FPS. That eight-fold height, by the way, works at more pixels than the 5K made. However, there is an elephant in the room. AK Games. As Tom's Hardware reported, Nvidia's demos only showed 8K Triple A playback with DLSS 2.0 in what they call ultra operating mode. Now, in the past, DLSS 2.0 has provided performance and measurement options with 1080p performance as well as DLSS 1.0, and quality rendering in 1440p before upgrade, usually up to 4K. Now, ultra performance still uses 1440p, but instead of making sensible jumps down to 4K, it tries to capture that data and get to 8K. I mean, that's a lot of speculation to be made about what are the smeary pixels? So does it look good? Of course, in a 4K display, there is no basis for using it because the only real effect is similar to anti-aliasing which can be fined for less performance in some ways. But if you are one of the few who are right with the 8K display today, here are some shots of what you can expect to see from 4K native compared to 8K DLSS ultra performance compared to 8K native. You can clearly see that the performance of the 8K DLSS Ultra brings more important information than 4K. Or not at traditional 8K standards. I mean, check the text and details away from this shot for example. The 8K DLSS ends up being very close to the native 8K here. Or incomplete. And the same agreement with these grates is still low on this shot. They are almost completely eliminated in 4K, however

Post a Comment

Previous Post Next Post